Issue 80174 - note's positioning (anchor) defect
Summary: note's positioning (anchor) defect
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 59745
Alias: None
Product: Calc
Classification: Application
Component: ui (show other issues)
Version: OOo 2.2
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: spreadsheet
QA Contact: issues@sc
URL:
Keywords: oooqa
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-30 11:52 UTC by gunyball
Modified: 2007-07-30 12:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments
"my cell" after inserting of 50 rows (145.03 KB, text/plain)
2007-07-30 11:59 UTC, gunyball
no flags Details
"my note" after inserting of 50 rows (145.51 KB, text/plain)
2007-07-30 11:59 UTC, gunyball
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description gunyball 2007-07-30 11:52:21 UTC
in Calc:
1. write "my cell" into cell B2
2. insert a note into cell B2 and write  "my note" into the note
3. then insert 50 rows before the cell B2
4. point the mouse pointer on your cell that contains the text "my cell" and try
to find out where your note gone.. 

in my opinion the note should have been anchored with the cell it was originally
inserted (which is now cell B52) and should always be visible at the same
distance as it was inserted
Comment 1 gunyball 2007-07-30 11:59:06 UTC
Created attachment 47200 [details]
"my cell" after inserting of 50 rows
Comment 2 gunyball 2007-07-30 12:00:00 UTC
Created attachment 47201 [details]
"my note" after inserting of 50 rows
Comment 3 Regina Henschel 2007-07-30 12:45:21 UTC
This is in no way a P1 issue, see
http://www.openoffice.org/scdocs/ddIssues_EnterModify.html#priority

The note position doesn't change when inserting rows, but it changes if rows are
deleted. I guess, that it is the same underlaying problem than in issue 59745
and issue 63671, but developers should decide whether to unite them.

Note position should be relative to anchor cell.
Comment 4 frank 2007-07-30 12:53:43 UTC
double to Issue 59745

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 59745 ***
Comment 5 frank 2007-07-30 12:54:04 UTC
closed double