Issue 22740 - Chart statistics feature needed
Summary: Chart statistics feature needed
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of issue 366
Alias: None
Product: General
Classification: Code
Component: chart (show other issues)
Version: 3.3.0 or older (OOo)
Hardware: All All
: P3 Trivial (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: kla
QA Contact: issues@graphics
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-22 22:14 UTC by simpoir
Modified: 2013-02-24 21:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Issue Type: ENHANCEMENT
Latest Confirmation in: ---
Developer Difficulty: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this issue.
Description simpoir 2003-11-22 22:14:51 UTC
A lot of our college students are using Openoffice for financial reasons (and
because it's simple and powerfull) but there is a major lack in Charts creation
that keeps us to OfficeXP and that could lead, if fixed to the migration to
Openoffice. 
Sciences labs always include charts with statistic about it's. The problem is
mainly about the lack of regression types: 
polynomial, and moving average which are included with excel xp(as well as
power, linear, exponential and logarythmic). Opening a .DOC document containing
a chart with polynomial regression doesn't makes the chart display correctly.

Also, the possibility to include the formula to of the regression line as a part
of the chart would be nice instead of using Linest() , etc. functions.

Thanks for considering that request. We hope to hear about it in the future
releases of Openoffice, making big publicity for the project in the college;).

Simon Poirier
Comment 1 kla 2003-12-01 13:45:33 UTC
duplicate

*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of 366 ***
Comment 2 kla 2003-12-01 13:46:18 UTC
closed
Comment 3 derekhtodd 2005-02-16 15:41:29 UTC
Please note this issue has been incorrectly identified as a duplicate os Issue
366, which is an RFE on defining custom ranges for error bars, and has nothing
to do with regression analysis.

This confusion is resulting in inappropriate comments being filed in Issue 366
by confused members, which is beginning to effectively cloud Issue 366.

Thank you.