Apache OpenOffice (AOO) Bugzilla – Issue 122931
The "major interval" of the Y axis in a XY graph is changed in an unwanted way.
Last modified: 2013-08-12 08:37:05 UTC
Premise. I have the Italian version of AOO 4. I translated the italian label "parte principale" in "major interval", but I do not know if it is the correct translation of the label. The "parte principale" is the grid interval of the Y-axis. 1. Fire up AOO Calc. 2. Type in a few pairs of decimal numbers. 3. Insert a XY chart showing those numbers. 4. Select the XY chart. 5. In the XY chart we define the "major interval" of Y-axis with a decimal number (2.5 for example). 6. Press "OK" to confirm the choise. 7. Change another propriety of the Y-axis (the color of the line, for example). 8. Press "OK" to confirm the choise. Result: The XY chart is not correct. The "major interval" of Y-axis is changed in a way not wanted. Expected result: Should not change the main part though I have not specifically requested. Note: When you re-open the properties of the Y axis, I noticed that the "major interval" seems to be truncated to the integer part of the number entered, if it was previously set to a decimal value greater than 1, instead is set to 1 (one) if the value of the "major interval" is set to a value less than 1.
"Major interval" is a correct name in English version. I confirm this behavior as a regression.
Can not confirm in Rev. 1503704 Win 7. Y Axis - Scale - Major interval -> setting is preserved. Please attach example.
Created attachment 81233 [details] Bug test doc
See attached file. Y major interval is set to 0.5 and chart looks fine. Open Y axis > Scale, major interval shows 1. Push OK button and Y scale interval on chart change to 1.
Thanks. Happens only in attachment 81233 [details]. All other testing with my own fresh charts were OK.
On my system it always happens...
One of a dozen checks: http://screencast.com/t/vNWrmq4U7cgx
(In reply to Edwin Sharp from comment #7) > One of a dozen checks: > > http://screencast.com/t/vNWrmq4U7cgx You must enter a decimal value. With integer value it's OK.
Bug visible with non integer. Thanks.
reproduce the described defect in AOO 3.4.0, AOO 3.4.1 and AOO 4.0.0, but not in OOo 3.3.0 -> adjusting field version accordingly.